{"id":868,"date":"2023-02-07T21:03:29","date_gmt":"2023-02-07T16:03:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/?p=868"},"modified":"2023-02-07T21:03:31","modified_gmt":"2023-02-07T16:03:31","slug":"two-child-custody-cases-lead-to-successful-results-thanks-to-lawyer-ariane-gendron","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/two-child-custody-cases-lead-to-successful-results-thanks-to-lawyer-ariane-gendron\/","title":{"rendered":"Two child custody cases lead to successful results thanks to lawyer Ariane Gendron"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>In the first case, Devichy Lawyers (Ariane Gendron) represented the respondent. The applicant was requesting exclusive <a href=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/legal-procedure-for-child-custody-and-alimony\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"246\">custody<\/a> of the child, while reproaching the respondent primarily for being unstable due to her many moves (having changed dwellings seven times between January 2019 and September 2021). After analyzing the case, the judge upheld the shared custody arrangement between the applicant and the respondent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In another decision, Devichy Lawyers (Ariane Gendron) represented the applicant. Because the applicant had moved, she was asking the judge for a modification of the access and custody conditions related to their three-year-old child. After analyzing numerous applicable criteria, including the child\u2019s best interests, the judge granted exclusive custody of the child to the applicant. The judge granted access rights to the respondent, who was a military officer by profession.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ms. Gendron doesn\u2019t always win her case. See <a href=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/notice\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"58\">notice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ariane-Gendron.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"720\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ariane-Gendron.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-669\" srcset=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ariane-Gendron.jpg 720w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ariane-Gendron-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/Ariane-Gendron-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Ariane Gendron, Lawyer<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the first case, Devichy Lawyers (Ariane Gendron) represented the respondent. The applicant was requesting exclusive custody of the child, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,16],"tags":[52],"class_list":["post-868","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-child-custody","category-sample-cases","tag-ariane-gendron-lawyer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/868","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=868"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/868\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":869,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/868\/revisions\/869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=868"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=868"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=868"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}