{"id":893,"date":"2023-07-12T19:37:43","date_gmt":"2023-07-12T14:37:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/?p=893"},"modified":"2023-07-13T00:15:46","modified_gmt":"2023-07-12T19:15:46","slug":"no-shared-custody-until-18-months","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/no-shared-custody-until-18-months\/","title":{"rendered":"No shared custody until 18 months"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Attorney Charl\u00e8ne Marois represented the mother in this <a href=\"http:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/legal-procedure-for-child-custody-and-alimony\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/legal-procedure-for-child-custody-and-alimony\/\">custody<\/a> case involving a 9-week-old child. The father sought shared custody starting at 6 months, but the Court ruled in favor of the mother.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given that the child was very young and exclusively breastfeeding, the Court believed that at this stage, it was premature and contrary to the child&#8217;s needs to remove exclusive parental time from the mother. Therefore, gradual visitation rights were granted to the father until the child reaches 18 months, allowing the mother to breastfeed the child according to their needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Not all our clients always prevail. See <a href=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/notice\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"58\">notice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-895\" srcset=\"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-1024x1024.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-1536x1536.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/Charlene-Marois-Square-2048x2048.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Attorney Charl\u00e8ne Marois represented the mother in this custody case involving a 9-week-old child. The father sought shared custody starting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,16],"tags":[69,9,18],"class_list":["post-893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-child-custody","category-sample-cases","tag-charlene-marois-lawyer","tag-child-custody-2","tag-family-lawyer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=893"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":896,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/893\/revisions\/896"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/csklawyers.ca\/familylaw\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}